Counting Your Dollars:
Contracting for the Services of an Independent Auditor
of County Finances

Synopsis

“The purpose of an independent audit is to protect the equity of the entity audited with tests that determine if the assets are properly protected.”[1] This report covers the bid process for securing the services of an independent auditor for the County of Santa Cruz. It has been the practice of the county to go out to bid for external independent audit services every three to four years. However, the current external independent auditing firm has been retained for the past seven years. The bid process was used to select a new external independent auditor for the County of Santa Cruz.

Background

The Grand Jury, as required by law, is responsible for performing an independent audit of county offices and investigating spending by city and county governments. The investigations may be conducted on a selective basis each year but shall not duplicate examination or financial statements that have been performed by or for the Board of Supervisors.[2] In earlier years, the Grand Jury budget included funds to employ an outside independent auditor to fulfill these duties. Subsequently, while retaining oversight of this task, the Grand Jury transferred to the County of Santa Cruz the responsibility for contracting with an external independent auditor for these services, along with the budget item to cover this expense. To fulfill both the county and Grand Jury responsibilities to conduct audits of county records, a County Audit Committee was formed. This committee is comprised of Santa Cruz County Administrative Officer/Representative, County Auditor-Controller, County Treasurer/Tax Collector/Recorder/Clerk and two members of the Santa Cruz County Grand Jury. In addition, two members of the Treasurer Oversight Committee have been added to the County Audit Committee membership.

Scope

The County of Santa Cruz contracts with an outside audit firm to furnish independent audit and compilation services of county accounts. These services are obtained through a Request for Proposal (RFP) bid process. Two members of the Santa Cruz County Grand Jury, one from the Audit and Finance Committee and one from the Grand Jury membership at large, followed the bid process from the Invitation to Bid to the Recommendation of Acceptance of the best contract.

Sources

Meetings:

County of Santa Cruz Audit Committee:

·        August 25, 2004. 

·        February 14, 2005.

·        May 9, 2005.

·        June 6, 2005.

Bidders’ Conference, December 10, 2004.

Analysis of Bids, February 14, 2005.

Entrance Conference, June 6, 2005.

Reviewed:

Bidders’ List.

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, Fiscal Year 2003.

County Analysis for Award of Contract.

Government Code § 25250.

Grand Jury Reports: 

·        1990-1991.

·        1997-1998.

·        1999-2000.

·        2000-2001.

·        2001-2002.

Management Letter, Fiscal Year 2003.

Management Letter, Fiscal Year 2004.

Penal Code § 925.

Request for Proposal.

Single Audit Report, Fiscal Year 2003.

 

Findings

1.      It has been the practice of the county to request proposals for independent audit services every three or four years.

2.      The current independent audit firm has provided services for seven years.

3.      The 2001-2002 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Final Report recommended that retention of an independent auditor should be reviewed every three years and changed at least every six years.

4.      This Request for Proposal process was to select an independent auditor to prepare an annual audit for the County of Santa Cruz beginning with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005. The contract would be awarded for one to three years, whichever would be the most cost effective for the county.

5.      The independent audit firm provides various reports to the Santa Cruz County Audit Committee throughout the year. These reports require County Audit Committee review.

6.      The Request for Proposal process began with preparation of the bid documents that:

·        outlined the requirements of the county;

·        described the basis on which the bids would be judged; and

·        requested the qualifications of the bidders.

Invitations to Bid were sent to 44 qualifying accounting firms, locally and throughout northern and central California. Four bidders attended the bidders’ conference on December 10, 2004. Proposals were received on January 14, 2005 from all four firms present at the bidders’ conference. The proposals were evaluated according to the criteria established in the bid documents as outlined in Appendix A. Using this comprehensive criteria, the County Audit Committee recommended awarding the contract to the firm that best met the county’s needs: Bartig, Basler, and Ray.

7.      Two members of the Santa Cruz County Grand Jury are active members of the County Audit Committee.

Conclusions

1.      Response to Santa Cruz County’s request for proposals was minimal.

2.      The County Audit Committee did not follow the recommendation of the 2001-2002 Santa Cruz County Grand Jury stating that independent audit services should be reviewed every three years with no one firm providing services for more than two consecutive three-year contracts. Good accounting practices and procedures dictate a change of auditing firms.

3.      Criteria used to evaluate bids was comprehensive.

4.      Grand Jury membership on Santa Cruz County Audit Committee fulfills the Grand Jury’s mandated responsibilities as outlined in Penal Code § 925. The County Audit Committee met four times during fiscal year 2004-2005.

Recommendations

1.      The County of Santa Cruz Auditor should continue to actively seek and qualify new bidders for future invitations for proposals and should update the current list.

2.      Review of the contract for independent audit services or invitation to bid should be scheduled every three years with no one firm providing services for more than two consecutive three-year contracts.

3.      The County of Santa Cruz should continue to notify the Grand Jury of County Audit Committee activities.

4.      The County Audit Committee should continue to meet at least twice each year, more frequently if needed.

 

Responses Required

 

Entity

Findings

Recommendations

Respond Within

Santa Cruz County

Board of Supervisors

1, 2, 3

1, 2, 4

60 Days

August 30, 2005

Santa Cruz County

Auditor-Controller

3

1, 2, 3, 4

90 Days

September 30, 2005

Santa Cruz County

Audit Committee

3, 7

2, 4

90 Days

September 30, 2005





[1] Rudolph Vargas, Vargas and Company, Minutes Audit Committee Meeting, August 25, 2004.

[2] Penal Code § 925 and Government Code § 25250.